![]() ![]() Some argue that we can always have some self-control in ourselves – do only what is necessary to secure safety and leave the attackers to be dealt with by the law. The question here is how far should we allow ourselves to take the law into our own hands. History has shown how many have killed just to protect the people they love, as much as they would have realised that taking the life of another human being is wrong. Like animals, man has an innate and primal instinct to protect his loved ones and offspring. They had not expected their loved one to be slashed and they did not expect to react they way they did in trying to protect her. Maybe culpable homicide not amounting to murder, but definitely not murder. It is as clear as day that this incident was not murder, according to the definition of murder. What if the robber had surrendered and was intentionally beaten while he was tied up, although the family claims that this was not the case?Įye agree with the Attorney General. Others felt that they should not have taken the law into their own hands. Yet there are some who defended the court’s move to charge the father and son and argued that their innocence and guilt should be left to the courts to decide, as details of what exactly happened leading to the death of the robber are still sketchy. They are seen as people who put their lives at risk to save their loved ones. Like the incident in Houston, the father and son are seen as heroes instead of criminals by the majority. Netizens took to social media and argued that the duo should not be charged with murder for which if they are found guilty would mean a death sentence.Īttorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail also agreed that the two should not have been charged with murder and has given his word to personally look into the case. Technically, murder is defined as unlawful premeditated or planned killing of another human being. Both father and son were eventually charged in court for murder, which sparked outrage among many Malaysians who felt it was unfair and debated on the definition of murder. Halfway around the world in Malaysia, a father and son were charged for the murder of a robber during a home invasion incident last month.Īccording to news reports, the duo had reacted in defence of their wife and mother, who was attacked and slashed on the arm by the robber.īased on the statement of the wife and mother who was slashed during the attempted robbery, her husband and son had acted purely to keep her safe, and the robber was still alive when they had him tied up. Houston police, after questioning the young man, decided to leave it to a grand jury to determine if he should be charged in court for taking the life of the robber. The store proprietor’s son insisted that he shot the robber in self-defence and was only protecting his family from the robber. There was an exchange of gunfire and the robber eventually ended up dead. In the melee, the son of the proprietor then grabbed his father’s gun and fired a shot. LAST September, a masked robber armed with a shotgun walked into a family-run convenience store in Houston, Texas.Īs he pointed the gun at the daughter of the store’s owner, the latter reached for his own handgun, prompting the robber to swing the gun in his direction. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |